<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZK AJAX Framework Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adamsbros.org/2010/01/30/zk-ajax-framework-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adamsbros.org/2010/01/30/zk-ajax-framework-introduction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lwpro2</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamsbros.org/2010/01/30/zk-ajax-framework-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>lwpro2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adamsbros.org/?p=139#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Nice article. However, to be frank, I always can&#039;t appreciate the fancy of such framework. Instead of ZK&#039;s new language, why not we ourselves pick up javascript, jquery ourselves. Why not we have our own say, instead of letting ZK control. Plus there is a performance impact using its translation mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. However, to be frank, I always can&#8217;t appreciate the fancy of such framework. Instead of ZK&#8217;s new language, why not we ourselves pick up javascript, jquery ourselves. Why not we have our own say, instead of letting ZK control. Plus there is a performance impact using its translation mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

